Ethereum’s Scaling Dilemma: Do We Really Need So Many Layer 2 Solutions?

In partnership with

Hello everyone, it’s maxwell Please try to interact with our newsletter. I would like some feedback.

Ethereum has transformed from an experimental blockchain into the backbone of decentralized finance (DeFi), NFTs, and countless Web3 innovations. But with that growth has come a major challenge: scalability. High gas fees, slow transaction speeds, and network congestion have made Ethereum impractical for everyday users.

To solve this, we’ve seen an explosion of Layer 2 (L2) scaling solutions—protocols designed to offload Ethereum’s transaction load. Rollups, sidechains, state channels—every project is racing to become the dominant Ethereum scaling solution.

But here’s the real question: Do we actually need so many Layer 2s?

Or are we just witnessing a competitive land grab, where every project is trying to put its own spin on Layer 2 and capture value?

Let’s break it down.

Why Ethereum Needs Layer 2 Solutions

At its core, Ethereum is limited by block size and throughput. The network can process about 15 transactions per second (TPS)—nowhere near the scale required for mass adoption.

Every transaction competes for limited space on the blockchain, leading to high gas fees and slow confirmations during peak activity.

Layer 2 solutions attempt to fix this by moving transactions off the main chain (Layer 1) while still relying on Ethereum for security. The result? Lower fees and higher speed.

The Most Common L2 Approaches

1. Rollups → Process transactions off-chain and submit a single proof to Ethereum.

• Optimistic Rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism) assume transactions are valid unless proven fraudulent.

• ZK-Rollups (e.g., zkSync, StarkNet) use cryptography to verify transactions instantly.

2. Sidechains → Independent blockchains that connect to Ethereum but use their own consensus (e.g., Polygon PoS).

3. State Channels → Open payment channels between users for off-chain transactions (e.g., Raiden Network).

Without a doubt, Layer 2s have reduced fees and improved efficiency, but here’s where things get messy.

Too Many Layer 2s: A Fragmented Ecosystem?

While Ethereum’s scalability problem is real, not every Layer 2 project exists purely for innovation. Some are simply capitalizing on the hype, aiming to capture value rather than truly solving Ethereum’s bottlenecks.

1. Everyone Wants a Piece of the Layer 2 Market

The rise of Layer 2s isn’t just about technology—it’s also about business models and revenue streams.

Each Layer 2 project collects fees from users, locks billions of dollars in total value (TVL), and positions itself as the “go-to” scaling solution. This has led to a flood of new rollups and sidechains, each promising to be the best.

Some projects are genuinely innovating. Others? Just forking existing rollup technology with minor tweaks, hoping to capture a slice of the market.

2. Lack of Standardization Hurts Adoption

With so many different Layer 2s, liquidity and users are spread too thin.

• A DeFi app might launch on Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and zkSync separately, fragmenting users across multiple chains.

• Users constantly bridge assets between Layer 2s, creating security risks and inefficiencies.

Ironically, instead of scaling Ethereum as one unified system, we’ve created a maze of competing networks, each with its own quirks.

3. The Ethereum Roadmap Might Make Some Layer 2s Obsolete

Ethereum’s core developers are already working on Proto-Danksharding (EIP-4844) and full Danksharding, which will significantly reduce rollup costs and improve efficiency.

Some Layer 2 solutions might not even be needed in the long run—especially if Ethereum itself becomes scalable enough.

So, What’s the Future of Layer 2?

Despite the current fragmentation, not all Layer 2s will survive. The market will likely consolidate, leaving behind only the most efficient, well-adopted, and secure solutions.

What Needs to Happen?

1. Fewer, More Standardized Layer 2s → Instead of every new project launching its own rollup, we need a handful of dominant Layer 2s that work seamlessly together.

2. Better Bridges & Interoperability → Moving assets between L2s should be instant and secure, reducing friction for users.

3. Ethereum’s Roadmap Will Shape the Future → As Ethereum scales natively, Layer 2s will need to adapt or risk becoming irrelevant.

Who Will Win?

• Rollups (Optimistic & ZK) will dominate → They offer the best mix of security and scalability.

• Sidechains will stay, but for niche use cases → They offer faster transactions but don’t inherit Ethereum’s security.

• State Channels might fade away → Rollups already solve many of their use cases more efficiently.

Final Thoughts: Is Layer 2 Innovation or Just Business?

Layer 2 solutions are necessary, but the market is overcrowded with projects trying to claim their share.

Not every Layer 2 is solving a real problem—some are just trying to repackage existing technology and capture value. This has created a fragmented, confusing ecosystem, where users are constantly forced to navigate multiple networks, bridges, and liquidity pools.

Ethereum’s long-term roadmap will help consolidate Layer 2 solutions, making the network more efficient and unified. But until then, expect to see more rollups, sidechains, and new “scaling solutions”—each promising to be the next big thing.

The big question is: Which ones will actually stand the test of time?

I’ll be tracking these developments closely, so stay tuned for more insights on Ethereum’s evolution!

Until next time,

Maxwell

Pay No Interest Until Nearly 2027 AND Earn 5% Cash Back

Use a 0% intro APR card to pay off debt.
Transfer your balance and avoid interest charges.
This top card offers 0% APR into 2027 + 5% cash back!

Learn How To Apply Now